Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Composition question asked and answered (I think)



In a previous post -- "Bird-Watching in the West" -- Linda H. asked the following question regarding a collage I'd made (left):
 
Ok, I get that, once you point it out, my eyes will forever move in that direction when I see this piece of yours.
 

My question is, are you thinking to yourself ahead of time, "Ah, I need something in this corner to create movement! What will create that?"? Or do you see AFTER you'd dotted in those dots, realizing, "Oh! I'm a genius! I just created movement for my viewer's eyes!"?
 

Silly question, I know. Just call me dense about this stuff.

Linda, you're not dense about this stuff — it's so tricky, so elusive, and so subjective. Approaching making a collage is, to me, very different from approaching a subject to photograph.

In a collage yes, I'm thinking, "it looks empty here" and I look for something to place on the paper. Or, "I need movement across the piece. How can I create it?" It's the same way when I create a photomontage. I'm looking for balance, for contrast, for flow. Composition is more of a left-brained, analytical element for me when creating collages and/or photomontages.

Naturally, when I discover how well I created the movement then yes, I tell myself what a flipping genius I am! (Not really. But I'm delighted when I discover it!)

When composing a photograph, it's different. It's easier for me. In photography, I always ask myself, "What caught my eye? What do I like about what I'm seeing?" And then I attempt to fill my frame with just that. I look at something, figure out what I like, then begin creating the composition. The subject determines the composition.

For instance, a couple hours ago I was photographing a little piece of bamboo (you can see it above, second photo down). When I clipped off the piece during my walk, I thought I was going to photograph the way the new growth looked butted right up against the leaf. When I got it home, what caught my eye (and my heart) was a little swirl of leafage below the larger leaf. I knew I wanted the smaller leaf to be in focus. I knew I wanted a high-key look. And I knew I had to incorporate the stem so the leaf could swirl from something.

It was obvious to me that I should put the stem over toward the right so that the larger leaf could reach over to the left and the little swirly guy would intersect the larger one. I made sure the little leaf was in focus. I made sure I was overexposing by two stops to get the high-key look I wanted. And I made sure that the stem was standing perfectly vertical (I used masking tape to affix the stem to a can of spray paint). For me, this is relatively instinctive now and isn't nearly the same challenge as making a physical collage or even a photomontage. (Well, there are lots of challenges, but composition isn't the main one. Like, how do I keep from kicking my tripod?)

So to answer your question, yes, I'm consciously analyzing my composition when making collages because the process isn't second-nature to me yet. If an area looks too empty, I have to consciously figure out what I can put in there that adds to the look and that seems right (too often, it just looks stupid to me).

To give you an example of that, here's a physical collage I made yesterday. It's 5" x 5". And I don't especially like it. (So I shouldn't even be showing it to you, but . . .) All the elements in it are rather linear — the Japanese calligraphy, the blue rectangle of paper, the tree, so I thought I'd add a curved piece of paper (a coffee filter). But the lower right quadrant looked too empty, so I put a shiny silver circle there to add more curves. Not enough. So I cut a blue circle and put it slightly under the silver one. Why? To fill the space and to continue the concept of a half-moon that the coffee filter created. Hmmm...  Maybe I should cut out some small silver and blue dots and sprinkle them around three sides of the "moons!" That might just do it! When in doubt, add dots . . . Kind of like in photography: When in doubt, f/8!

Too much information? Too much rambling? Too confusing? Too many examples? Did I answer your question? I don't even remember your question at this point!

©Carol Leigh 

6 comments:

Linda Heinsohn said...

Hi Carol,

Yes, you answered my questions. Thank you for making this very in-depth answer. With illustrations, no less!

I can see how much I'm rushing this. Photography, creating art, etc. I can see, when I do slow down, how fearful I am there won't be anything "there" to express. Sigh.

Argh--paraphrasing Cesar Milan, about dogs, "You don't get the [hobby/passion/creative outlet] you WANT...you get the [hobby/passion/creative outlet] you NEED!"

Kinda personal stuff to be sharing here. Perhaps it will be for some greater good. Or you can always delete my rantings. :>D Linda

CJ said...

A great question, and a wonderfully thorough answer! Thanks for all the detail about your thought process. AND, I absolutely LOVE the little piece of bamboo shot!

Tom Kidd said...

Of all the things you do really well, composition of simple photo subjects is the one I'd most like to emulate. I was thinking that yesterday when I saw the car show images in your other blog. Thanks, and please keep such thoughts coming.

Carol Leigh said...

Tom, I appreciate your feedback very much. And yeah, this stuff will definitely keep coming. CJ, as always, thanks for your comment. So glad you like the little bamboo picture!

Judy said...

Linda: Thanks for the question. And Carol, thanks for the in-depth answer. I'm sure it's one I'll keep re-reading to help me absorb this information. Great post. And, the bamboo photograph -- elegant. One I wish I had taken.

Carol Leigh said...

Ooh, I like the "elegant" word. Thank you!